In this article Rambling In Pen (RIP) seeks to compare the similarities of the May 2020 Great Reset proposal and the Quotations from Chairman Mao Zedong (Mao Tse-Tung) also known as The Little Red Book which was published in China circa 1966.

The Question: Is the ‘Great Reset’ simply a technological upgrade to a Communist dictator’s pro-Stalinist propaganda which was used to streamline ideological uniformity and as a weapon against ‘counter-revolutionaries.

Let’s start with some background information.

The Great Reset

There are many people who now believe that “global elites” and world leaders pre-planned the current global pandemic by deliberately releasing a man-made coronavirus biological weapon (attributed to a lab in Wuhan China) so they can restructure world governance and ultimately take control of everything on the planet. (See UN Agenda 20-30 )

Activists across the world maintain that the main goal of the Great Reset plotters is to take global economic control and instate a Marxist totalitarian regime – aka the New World Order .

Many say that what’s going on now is way bigger than partisan politics.

The international intrigue involves the WHO, the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the IMF and most of the world’s intelligence agencies. Even the Vatican’s globalist Pope Francis is involved.

People around the world now believe that world leaders such as Jo Biden, Donald Trump, Angela Merkel and Boris Johnson are not only complicit in this but are having their strings pulled by a secret globalist elite who are determined to control the entire globe.

But how? Why? What’s the endgame?

In chilling detail, RIP has unpacked the endgame, which has virtually nothing to do with keeping us happy, alive and healthy.

Instead it has everything to do with replacing independent governments power with a centralised World government controlling the masses.

What we are facing is the dawning of a “technocratic” era which has been on the UN’s agenda for several decades.

All they’ve been waiting for is the triggering of a global event in order that their plan can be implemented.

Part of that plan is for a new world order, a technocratic utopian system which will track-n-trace every human being on the planet. Yes, a digital ID system.

This global ID system is being designed by the New York City based ID2020 Alliance.  The project is ultimately controlled by the Microsoft Corp. Bill Gate’s company became one of the founding partners back in January 2018 along with the Gavi Vaccine Alliance, which is another Gates-funded project. Funding also comes from longtime Gates collaborator and founder of ‘Big Pharma’ ….. The Rockefeller Foundation.

UK Politics, Mao Tse-Tung and the Little Red Book

Here’s an example of how the ideology in the Little Red Book was well known to British politicians. Back in 2015 as the UK chancellor, George Osbourne, addressed the House of Commons the shadow chancellor, John McDonnell, jumped up, pulled out a copy of Quotations from Chairman Mao Zedong (formerly known as Mao Tse-Tung) from his pocket, read a line from it and then threw it at the Chancellor.

McDonnell was met with laughter and jeering from the Conservative benches but he instantly attracted criticism as he appeared to elevate the words of a man responsible for millions of deaths in communist China.

The momentary appearance of what is more commonly known as The Little Red Book also whipped up a frenzy in the UK media. Commentators were left dumbstruck. Here was a democratically elected politician reciting the words of a notorious communist dictator.

And it wasn’t entirely clear why.

How Does One Interpret This?

Part of the problem with The Little Red Book is that nothing in it is contextualised particularly well – which makes using it in parliamentary outbursts a dicey business.

The incident involving John McDonnell – who saw fit to read from a copy of The Little Red Book in the UK parliament – is a case in point. McDonnell appeared to be using quotes from the book to accuse the UK government of trying to strike financial deals with China in order to build up a new British infrastructure.

His choice of aphorism (the conclusion of The People’s Democratic Dictatorship) does not actually mean what he seemed to think it meant. The point was lost and his stunt fell dreadfully flat.

Few modern-day politicians are likely to find much purchase among their electorates by reading from the Little Red Book in a national parliament, or indeed anywhere else in public. If any politicos are foolhardy enough to try then they should consider Mao’s words and “put more stock into what they say“.

So. Let’s take a moment to understand exactly what the Little Red Book was really all about.

The ‘Little Red Book’ – It’s Origins and Purpose

The original 1966 production of the Little Red Book was a type of political theatre. It was also intimately linked to the behind-the-scenes political manoeuvring that would ultimately be unleashed in China’s Cultural Revolution. In the end, it would become the symbol of crimes against humanity, mind control, social injustice and the abandonment of all humans rights.

However the book which was distributed during the Cultural Revolution was not simply used to streamline ideology and ideological uniformity, but it was also used as a weapon against any perceived “class enemies” or “counter-revolutionaries.

Red Guard factions (usually groups of middle school and university students) would use the book to accuse their own teachers, entrenched Chinese Communist Party bureaucrats and increasingly each other of betraying ‘Maoist‘ values. 

China’s radicalised youth were indoctranated to centre their ideological beliefs on Mao himself and the interpretation of his words in the Little Red Book.

Some of the quotations in the Little Red Book were from the 1950s and the period of global socialist/communist construction. However other quotes dated back to the 1930s. The Little Red Book was a vision of protracted warfare with the weak overcoming the strong. It was this that made the Little Red Book so potent for anti-capitalist audiences worldwide.

And yes, back in the 1960s, it became popular reading in left-wing circles both in the UK and France and beyond. 

The quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung’s Little Red Book were originally compiled by a department within the PLA Daily (People’s Liberation Army Daily). It was intended to be both an inspirational political and military document.

The initial publication covered 23 topics with around 200 selected quotations by the Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party. It was entitled 200 Quotations from Chairman Mao. It was first given to delegates of a conference on 5 January 1964 who were asked to comment on it. In response to the views of the deputies and compilers of the book, the work was expanded to address 25 topics with 267 quotations, and the title was changed simply to Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-Tung.

The work was re-issued to the delegates and then sent to select units of the People’s Liberation Army who received advance copies which were intended for educating red army troops.

In May 1967, the PLA General Political Department (the chief political organ under Central Military Commission) revised Quotations from Chairman Mao by adding a half title page with the sloganWorkers of the world, unite!“. This revision included three lines from the diary of revolutionary soldier Lei Feng who was considered a hero in China.

The political slogan “Workers of the World Unite is one of the most famous rallying cries which originated from The Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx. The essence of the slogan was that members of the working classes throughout the world should cooperate to defeat capitalism and achieve victory in the class conflict.

The Cultural Revolution: Mao launched the Cultural Revolution (also as the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution) in August 1966. He shut down the nation’s schools and created a massive youth mobilisation which took current party leaders to task for their embrace of bourgeois values and a lack of revolutionary spirit.

In the months that followed, the movement escalated as the students formed paramilitary groups called the Red Guards. They went on to attack and harass members of China’s elderly and intellectual population.

A personality cult quickly sprang up around Mao, similar to that which existed for Josef Stalin, with different factions of the movement claiming theirs was the true interpretation of Maoist doctrine. The population was urged to rid itself of the “Four Olds”

Old customs, old culture, old habits and old ideas.

After Chairman Mao died in 1976 Deng Xiaoping took over as China’ssupreme leader. He would control the Chinese government for the next 20 years.

During this time Dang used a civilian, police and military coalition to kill 1.5 million people, throw millions more into concentration camps after seizing their property. He also had millions of citizens tortured who had dared to voice opinions which were contrary to the official agenda.

China Today

Lets fast forward to the China of today and explore it’s influence over world politics and ultimately it’s role in the Great Reset.

We begin with an ongoing study by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) which is an international Cyber Policy Centre.

ASPI is an independent, non-partisan think tank which produces expert and timely advice by generating policy-relevant research and new ideas for governments, industry and civil society ranging from defence, security, strategic and cyber issues.

ASPI is one of the most authoritative and widely quoted contributors to public discussion of strategic policy especially on issues within Australia and the broader Indo-Pacific region. 

The reports on this database are both numerous and staggering. One report provides a detailed description and analysis of a mobile app which police and other officials use to communicate with the Integrated Joint Operations Platform, which is one of the main systems the Chinese authorities use for mass surveillance in Xinjiang.

Another report uses evidence from official sources, including government websites, media reports and other Chinese internet sources, to detail the unprecedented re-education campaign which has emerged in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in China since the Spring of 2017.

ASPI researchers have also identified and mapped more than 380 suspected detention facilities. This report details ‘re-education’ camps, detention centres and prisons that have been newly built or expanded since 2017.

To read more of the ASPI database and research into current day China go here —>

This is all eerily similar to Netflix’s Black Mirror episode “Nosedive,” which imagined a world controlled by a social points system.

The Great Reset

What We Know

COVID-19: This pandemic was first discussed in documents and simulation exercises which were published by the eugenicist Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation. Gate’s Event 201 was published just two months prior to the C19 pandemic being declared. Scenarios For The Future of Technology and International Development was published by the Rockefella Foundation back in 2010.

The World Economic Forum is led by Klaus Schwab, a technocrat and promoter of trans-humanism. Schwab has detailed how the “COVID-19” pandemic will to be used in order to implement a global monetary reset, a world digital currency, technocracy and a totalitarian one world government under the guise of socialism and environmentalism, with China as the model.

The World Health Organization shows further evidence of a conspiracy taking place when you consider how the WHO changed its pandemic criteria in advance so that it could declare a pandemic on spurious grounds. Donald Trump described the WHO as, “extremely China-centric and covers for China’s communist dictators whenever such cover is needed.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was elected as Director General of the World Health Organization in 2017. We now know that China worked tirelessly behind the scenes to ensure the election of Tedros. He had previously served in the government of the Marxist and violently repressive Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front.

The EPRD was backed financially by guess who? CHINA.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation: US Attorney General Bill Barr questioned whether Gate’s foundation would use digital certificates to monitor anyone who got vaccinated. This is directly linked to Gate’s company (Microsoft) and a global digital identity program known as ID2020

On Instagram, anti-vaccination activist Robert F. Kennedy, Jr posted a video featuring a “1984” style audience listening to Bill Gates, with text declaring that the Microsoft Corp co-founder “is conducting global social and medical experimentation,” via the World Health Organization. 

Gates is the largest private donor to the World Health Organization.

The United Nations and Agenda 2030 was adopted in 2015. It consists of 17 sustainable development goals (aka Green New Deal) which this agenda states should be achieved by the year 2030.

In goal number 3 under good health and wellbeing, it begins with the words, “vaccinate your family.” 

In goal 3.8 it states: “Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential healthcare services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all.”

Goal number 16.9 says, “By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration.”

The UN’s 2030 Agenda has a motto which is repeated endlessly in their documents, is that this agenda will “leave no one behind.”

Rockefeller Foundation published a paper back in 2010. It was titled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development. This paper outlined a scenario in which a pandemic has hit the world and the United Nations use it to expand their authority and increase their grip on power.

The authors of the paper claimed they were simply imagining and not predicting the future, but given the immense role the Rockefeller family bloodline and Rockefeller Foundation has had in pushing for a New World Order (NWO) and global Government, this is a ruse to cover for their active planning for a crisis scenario that they knew would happen. It is also a fine example of predictive programming.

‘Lock Step’

One of the scenarios of the Rockefeller paper is called ‘Lock Step’. To many this phrase has overtones of military police, armies and ultimately fascism. Just as Bill Gates was adamant that his Event 201 was just a “simulation” and not a “prediction”, so too does this Rockefeller Foundation paper.

Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development was published in May 2010 in cooperation with the Global Business Network which originated from futurologist Peter Schwartz.

The report contains various futurist scenarios which were developed by Schwartz and the Rockefeller Foundation President Judith Rodin. One scenario creates a world of top-down government control, authoritarian leadership and a growing pushback of citizen rights around the globe.

In this scenario it states,

In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.

Then the scenario gets very interesting:

During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.

Propaganda – Main Stream Media and Big Tech.

Propaganda is form of communication which is designed to influence a community towards a cause, opinion or position by presenting just one side of an argument.

Written, audio and visual media such as newspapers, television, radio and motion pictures are all available to psychological specialists who can create specifically targeted programs in order to achieve a specific goal.

There are just 6 global media giants who control 90% of everything we read, watch and listen to. Many people believe that these media giants use the illusion that they are there to inform and entertain us, when in fact they exist to serve the agenda of the NWO elite.

Nowadays we are told are that any opinion contrary to this elite agenda is either ‘hate speech’ or a socially harmful conspiracy theory.

In the book “Manufacturing Consent,” published by the late Ed Herman and professor Noam Chomsky, it describes how a privately owned free press can function as a propaganda machine in order to deceive its audience just as efficiently as any heavy-handed government censor.

Big Tech

It’s not the six giant media companies that govern all we see. No sir, Big Tech is here – and Big Tech is even more corrupted than the MSM.

For example Google owns YouTube. Facebook owns WhatsApp and Instagram. Let’s also give a mention to Twitter, who with its few hundred million users, dwarfs the global reach of all the MSM put together.

In recent years tech billionaires have bought main stream media companies. For example the Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos of Amazon, the Intercept is owned by Pierre Omidyar of eBay, Time magazine by Marc Benioff of Salesforce and the Atlantic is owned by Laurene Jobs of Apple.

In December 2018 New Yorks Times writer, Max Read wrote of the internet saying,

“Fake people with fake cookies and fake social-media accounts, fake-moving their fake cursors, fake-clicking on fake websites.” And maybe we shouldn’t even assume that the people are real.

Over at YouTube, the business of buying and selling video views is “flourishing,” as the Times reminded readers with a lengthy investigation in August. The company says only “a tiny fraction” of its traffic is fake, but fake subscribers are enough of a problem that the site undertook a purge of “spam accounts” in mid-December.

These days, the New York Times found, you can buy 5,000 YouTube views — 30 seconds of a video counts as a view — for as low as $15; oftentimes, customers are led to believe that the views they purchase come from real people. More likely, they come from bots. On some platforms, video views and app downloads can be forged in lucrative industrial counterfeiting operations. If you want a picture of what the Inversion looks like, find a video of a “click farm” hundreds of individual smartphones, arranged in rows on shelves or racks in professional-looking offices, each watching the same video or downloading the same app.”

This is obviously not real human traffic.

But what would real human traffic really look like? This is China today.

Many now believe that all this provides the powerful elitists with two distinct opportunities in order to mislead audiences:

  1. The elite can now take advantage of a fake internet directly.
  2. By posing as uniquely credible on an internet full of fakery, the elite can sell more sophisticated or subtle falsehoods.


The Little Red Book and The Great Reset appear to have a lot in common. Both share the following themes, which many alternative investigators know as the hallmarks of the New World Order:

– Erection of a supra-national World Government based on the idea of collectivism.

– Construction of a highly-segmented, two-tier society of rulers and slaves.

– Centralised control of all the key power centres of society: banking, police, military, media, education, industry and government itself.

– Manipulation of the masses through coercion, propaganda, deception, mind control and written/electronic influence in such a way that the population are unaware they are being attacked.

Needless to say this should alert us all as to the grave danger being faced by humanity today. We have a big challenge in front of us. We must inform a deliberately divided population of this NWO agenda.

On a deeper level, this NWO agenda is forcing us to wake up, speak up and stand up.

Thank you for reading. Now please send this everywhere you can – help us create a better world.

Author: Anonymous