This is a public demand to ban stratospheric aerosol geoengineering, weather modification, cloud seeding and the deliberate aerial spraying of chemical aerosols.

Much of the information published in this article was originally posted (Dec-2013) by Chemtrails Project UK.

Rambling In Pen demands that the British government ban ALL Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering and Aerial Aerosol Spraying over the United Kingdom.

And do so immediately!

Introduction

This video was published by Anonymous.

The subject of anthropogenic (man-made) global warming (AGW) has been a contentious issue for several years, and is continually subject to vociferous debate.

The solution to the AGW problem being touted by the global elite et-al is geoengineering. This can be defined as “the deliberate large scale intervention in the earth’s climate system in order to moderate global warming”.

In the UK this issue is now regulated by the House of Commons. 

One branch of geoengineering, is called stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG) and this is of particular concern to many scientists.

At the United Nations many government agencies have admitted that geoengineering operations are potentially disastrous. So much so that in 2010 a UN moratorium was placed on these operations, with 193 signatories agreeing to place a ban on all geoengineering projects with the exemption of “small-scale scientific research studies”, weather modification and carbon capture.

Due to the severity of the issues set out in this article the purpose of this posting is to advance that moratorium with a permanent ban on ALL stratospheric aerosol geoengineering, weather modification, cloud seeding and the deliberate aerial spraying of chemical aerosols – military or otherwise.

Climate Change – Not Man-Made?

Geoengineering is defined as “the deliberate large scale intervention in the earth’s climate system in order to moderate global warming”.

What follows is a brief presentation of the arguments appertaining to climate change.

Whilst all eminent scientists agree that climate change is indeed occurring, there is a significant divide between them.

Whilst some advocate the idea of carbon-related (man-made) anthropogenic global warming (AGW), others insist that climate change is a natural phenomenon that has been occurring for thousands of years and that the planet is actually cooling rather than warming.

The next sections present a brief overview of the claims being made in both sides of the debate.

Arguments for AGW

The main proponent for AGW is the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, a political branch of the UN), who make the following claims:

  • Global temperatures have been increased over the last 150 years, in accordance with industrialisation and the increased burning of fossil fuels.
  • Sea levels are rising.
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice is melting.
  • No global warming has been recorded for 17 years, but they claim that is because much of the heat has gone into the oceans.

Arguments Against AGW

The IPCC claims have been countered by various bodies, including the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), a body of 40 independent scientists. Their arguments are as follows:

  • Despite us putting more CO2 into the atmosphere, there has been no measured global increase in temperatures for 17 years. 
  • There has been an ongoing sea level rise of approx. 7” per century since the last ice age.
  • The amount of Arctic and Antarctic ice is increasing not decreasing.
  • There is no evidence supporting the oceans-absorbing-heat theory.

Such is the intensity of the opposition, over 30,000 US scientists have also petitioned that climate change is a natural phenomenon and that carbon dioxide emissions are not a significant factor.

Amongst the many claims made to discredit scientists or groups within the climate change debate, the most pronounced appears to be the IPCC’s own admission that their incorrect prediction of the Himalayan glaciers melting by 2035 was not based on scientific research. 

This has fuelled concerns about the background of the IPCC, which is a political, non-scientific and opinion-based branch of the United Nations with a restricted brief of investigation. 

The misunderstandings surrounding global warming may well be intentional, with the much dis-credited American Council of Foreign Relations admitting they spend literally millions each year to deliberately confuse people on this subject. 

Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering(SAG)

The term geoengineering is used to describe the intervening steps that could be taken by man to combat (man-made) anthropogenic global warming (AGW).

As previously presented in this article, there is huge doubt surrounding the idea of AGW which, in itself, leads to concerns that geoengineering measures may be unnecessary and, therefore, be a possible waste of time, money and resources.

However, of utmost concern are the risks that are associated with geoengineering.

Furthermore, whilst many geoengineering practices are already patented and underway, attention must be paid to one particular aspect of geoengineering, Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering (SAG) which includes a technique known as Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI).

Stratospheric Aerosol Injection(SAI)

SAI is essentially the spraying of aerosols (typically aluminium oxide, barium, strontium, sulphuric acid and other toxic substances) by aeroplanes into the Earth’s atmosphere, modifying the weather in order to affect local and global climate.

The idea is to create artificial cloud cover that will reflect sun radiation back into space with the purported intention of reducing the Earth’s atmospheric temperature.

Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering is currently being proposed as a Solar Radiation Management (SRM) technique, with submissions for testing already accepted by the Solar Radiation Management Government Initiative (SRMGI). 

Benefits of SAG

There are no proven benefits of SAG to the general population. Beneficiaries, however, may include the following:

  • Financial gains for the organisations and people associated with these programs – e.g., manipulating then betting on the weather and betting on food prices. 
  • GMO corporations (e.g., Monsanto) having a control of food supply with their abiotic stress resistant GM seeds. 
  • Countries who may gain a military advantage through controlling the weather and manipulating the atmosphere. 

Whether these SAG operations will actually reduce global temperatures (should this even be necessary) is in great dispute. This will be discussed later in this article.

Risks of SAG

The proposal for climate geoengineering – presently banned under a UN moratorium – is to spray vast amounts of heavy metals and other toxic substances into the atmosphere, with which there are numerous concerns:

  • The Solar Radiation Management Research Governance Initiative (SRMGI) itself concludes the range of SRM research includes “potentially risky, large-scale experiments in the real world.” 
  • The United States’ own Government Accountability Office states “not one geoengineering technique is safe and their implementation could cause more damage than the supposed catastrophe they intend to avoid.” 
  • A Harvard University study also reveals the lethal consequence of tiny particles in the atmosphere.  (Such toxic particulates in the atmosphere are one of the consequences of Aerial Aerosol Spraying.)
  • The Neurotoxicology (brain poisoning) division of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says that exposure to airborne Particulate Matter “is an environmental health risk of global proportions.” 
  • Increases in neurological disorders, like Alzheimer’s disease, that are linked to aluminium which raises concerns about the fallout of aluminium from Aerial Aerosol Spraying. 
  • Increase of ‘global dimming’  – Over 20% of the sun’s direct rays are no longer reaching the planet – believed to be caused by an increase in air pollution.
  • Poor crop yields caused by abiotic stress (e.g., drought, heavy metal contamination, too much moisture, fungal overgrowth – all consequences of Aerial Aerosol Spraying) cornering farmers into purchasing aluminium- and abiotic stress-resistant GM seed. 
  • Increase in diseases based on vitamin D deficiency, like Rickets, due to lack of sunlight on the skin. 
  • Further damage to the ozone layer. 
  • Blue skies artificially turning white. 
  • Severe weather conditions, droughts and flooding. 
  • Increased chances of climate-related international conflict. 
  • Spraying toxic substances in our environment is not going to be good for us. 

Whilst some of these issues may represent an obvious opportunity for certain stakeholders to profiteer, each issue is a risk which poses a real and serious problem for the rest of humanity.

Further, when considering the views of the many imminent scientists and organisations that disagree with the underlying concept of man-made climate change – casting doubt on the entire concept of Anthropogenic Global Warming – it can be concluded that these may all be unnecessary risks.

Historic Aerial Spraying Crimes Against Humanity

In addition to Stratospheric Aerosol Engineering, it is pertinent to examine other historic aerial spraying programmes which have been associated (officially or otherwise) with both the British and American military.

Both these crimes against humanity are no longer held in a moratorium within the UK Official Secrets Act.

Agent Orange

During the Vietnam War Agent Orange was a defoliant sprayed by US airforce to destroy jungles and uncover the enemy’s hiding places. It contained dioxin, which is one of the most toxic chemicals known to man.

As a result of spraying Agent Orange over the Vietnamese population, more than 400,000 people were killed or maimed, and at least 500,000 children were born with mild to severe birth defects.

Additionally, 5 million acres of forests and millions more of farmland were destroyed. Agent Orange is said to have killed 10 times more people than all chemical weapons combined.

Following an unprecedented $289m cancer ruling verdict against Monsanto in California, Hanoi is now seeking justice for all the victims of exposure to the Agent Orange chemical attacks.

The Secret Science Investigation

During the Cold War, the British Government used the general public as unwitting biological and chemical warfare guinea pigs on a much greater scale than previously thought.

In more than 750 secret operations, hundreds of thousands of ordinary Britons were subjected to ‘mock’ biological and chemical warfare attacks launched from aircraft, ships and road vehicles.

However, research carried out by Ulf Schmidt, Professor of Modern History at the University of Kent, revealed that British military aircraft dropped thousands of kilos of a chemical of ‘largely unknown toxic potential’ on British civilian populations in and around Salisbury in Wiltshire, Cardington in Bedfordshire and Norwich in Norfolk.

Ultimately the professor’s research revealed that around 4,600 kilos of the chemical, zinc cadmium sulphide (now thought to be potentially carcinogenic, on account of its cadmium content) were dispersed from ships, aircraft and moving lorries between 1953 and 1964.

You can read the results of Professor Schmidt’s investigation in his book -> Secret Science 

Chemtrails – Covert Operations On Massive Scale

Aerosol spraying is a now a covert operation being on a grand scale.

For example. Evergreen’s fleet of B-747 supertankers are fitted with their own patent of pressurized ejection ports capable of delivering tons of chemical weather modification aerosols over a distance of 200 miles. 

This aircraft was originally presented to the public for it’s effective wildfire containment capabilities

However, not one of Evergreen’s aircraft has ever been deployed to assist the numerous killer wildfires in the western USA since it’s public debut in 2009. 

Are these flying super-tankers now left idling in an airport hanger? 

No, these mammoth 747′s are currently being used to deploy geo-engineering aerosols all around the planet including the UK. This capability is fully acknowledged within the Evergreen Air patent.

Weather Modification and .Gov/Lies

Weather modification consists of three major categories:

1) Suppression of weather patterns.

2) Intensification of weather patterns.

3) Introduction of completely new weather patterns.

The two basic methods to accomplish weather modification include “cloud seeding” and “directed-energy.”

In the UK a secret House of Commons meeting on the regulation of geoengineering held in 2010 decided that the term weather modification should be officially removed from the definition of geoengineering.

Weather Modification is therefore no longer regarded as geoengineering by the British government.

However, weather modification is described by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) as purposefully augmenting precipitation, reducing hail damage, dispersing fog and other types of cloud and storm modifications – using techniques such as cloud seeding.

According to the WMO such technologies are still striving to achieve any sound scientific foundation. This is despite the fact that various operational programmes are currently taking place in the atmosphere over many countries around the world.

This process is regarded under a United Nations charter as an illegal act.

Using Weather as Warfare

Whilst the term ‘chemtrails’ (a contraction of ‘chemical trails’) may be dismissed by some as a conspiracy theory it should be noted that the term was first used in the USA’s own Space Preservation Act of 2001 when proposing which exotic weapons systems should be banned.

However, it was omitted from the final draft and was therefore not banned and is still permitted.

The term ‘Chemtrails’ was first introduced by the Department of Defense as the title of a US Air Force’s chemistry course training program.

Cloud seeding and modifying the ionosphere via chemical injection is described in pages 24, 29 and 30 of the US chemistry course training manual. The chapter is entitled ‘Weather as a force multiplier: Owning the weather by 2025′.

This secret US military program is also used in conjunction with associated electromagnetic frequency technologies such as HAARP – which is a new generation of sophisticated weaponry used under the US Strategic Defense Initiative.

HAARP is jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy.

These revelations were first revealed by world-renowned scientist, Dr. Rosalie Bertell, who confirmed that,

“US military scientists are working on weather systems as a potential weapon.

These methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapour rivers in the Earth’s atmosphere to produce targeted droughts or floods.” 

Chemical Weapons Testing

Chemical Weapon is a chemical bomb/missile used to cause intentional death or harm through the toxic properties of the chemical used. Munitions, devices and other equipment specifically designed to weaponise toxic chemicals also fall under the definition of chemical weapons.

Under the Chemical Weapons Convention (1993), there is a legally binding, worldwide ban on the production, stockpiling, and use of chemical weapons and their precursors.

However, large stockpiles of chemical weapons continue to exist, usually justified as a precaution against possible chemical attack from an aggressor.

It is commonplace to associate chemical weapons use with middle eastern countries.

However, it should be noted that the testing of chemical weapons has also been performed on the British public.

This only became public knowledge as recently as 2002 when a government report revealed that biological trials using aerial spraying were performed on the British public between 1940 and 1979. (see above – Secret Science)

Chemtrails: Deliberate Causing of Weather Extremes

As illustrated in the previous Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering (SAG) section (above), jet aircraft trails are being implicated as both the cause of (and the solution to) climate change and weather extremes.

The IPCC’s Climate Scientist, Dr Joyce Penner, has stated,

“The contrails that are spreading that you can identify as contrails, those would tend to warm the atmosphere”. 

That makes the idea that SAG will reduce the issue of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) highly debatable.

In an IPCC Special Report it also confirms,

“Contrails tend to warm the Earth’s surface, similar to thin high clouds”

Again, this suggests that SAG would be cause of climate change rather than a solution.

This view is also supported by numerous scientific claims that engineering an artificial layer in the Earth’s stratosphere will trap in more heat than it will reflect – thus increasing global temperatures. 

It is also becoming common knowledge that the delivery methods of SAG (chemtrails) may cause significant problems, notably ozone depletion.

Evidence That Illegal Aerial Spraying Activities Have Started

Regardless of the British Government’s lying, there is an abundance of evidence that Aerial Aerosol Spraying activities have already started:

  • UK rainwater test results contaminated with high levels of heavy metals (e.g., aluminium) and abnormal pH. 
  • The formidable rise in so-called ‘chemtrails’ phenomenon which includes literally millions of observations and experiences that are not compatible with the official ‘contrails’ explanation.
  • The vast majority of persistent trails in the sky do not come from commercial flights as the planes involved usually don’t appear on www.flightradar24.com (whereas over 80% of commercial UK flights do).
  • Unusual phenomenon of “on-off” aircraft trail output (abrupt and/or intermittent) with no effect on planes’ altitude – witnessed regularly and captured up-close on video. 
  • Circumstantial evidence of the emergence of multiple, persistent contrails spreading and turning our blue skies white – the desired result of SAG operations.
  • Anecdotal evidence of two planes flying at similar altitudes, locations and times, where one plane leaves no trail, but the other leaves a trail that persists for hours.
  • The modern-day sky, routinely filled with persistent trails forming the patterns of tramlines, asterisks and noughts-and-crosses boards. Whilst air traffic has doubled over the last 20 years, seemingly no-one can recall such a phenomenon ever occurring before the early-1990’s. (And this is despite fuels of 20 years ago not being as clean as they are today.)
  • Extreme weather behaviour (including the breaking of thousands of UK and US weather records and unprecedented amount of UK floods warnings) coinciding with increased Aerial Aerosol Spraying activities over recent years – consistent with NASA’s claim that “contrails, especially persistent contrails, represent a human-caused increase in the Earth’s cloudiness, and are likely to be affecting climate and ultimately our natural resources.” 
  • Global dimming. 
  • Whistleblower evidence from A C Griffths, a former US government (CIA, US Air Force and NSA) employee with cryptographic clearance, reveals his involvement with “the chemtrail program”
  • Photographic evidence. 

What Harm Are Chemtrails Doing To Our Planet?

According to the research of Dane Wigington of GeoengineeringWatch.org, chemtrails and geo-engineering are the single, greatest threat to life on Planet Earth.

UN scientists estimate that 150-200 species of plant, insect, bird and mammal become extinct every 24 hours.

This is nearly 1,000 times the “natural” or “background” rate and it is greater than anything that the world has experienced since the vanishing of the dinosaurs nearly 65 million years ago.

Chemtrails appear to have triggered climate feedback loops affecting ocean currents between the Atlantic and the Arctic. One of these feedback loops is methane expulsion.

This methane expulsion has not been happening over a hundred years or even decades. It has been happening only over the last few years.

This is a global, game-changing event.

These chemtrails are posing health risks and disease to all life. They are creating artificial weather events and increasing the demand for the need of poisonous GMO stress resistant crops.

Risks include:

Drought in Africa and Asia.

Continued ocean acidification from CO2.

Ozone depletion.

No more blue skies, and less solar power.

If it is not stopped it will actually increase warming.

Human error with toxic materials is hazardous as are the unexpected consequences of mistakes.

Commercial control and the use of military technology conflicts with current treaties.

Visibility into night skies are compromised.

Who Benefits from Chemtrailing?

Questions have to be raised about whose hands are on the thermostat of the world’s climate. Perhaps the list below is a clue.

  • The Global Ruling Elite.
  • Disaster Insurance Companies.
  • Utility Companies. Property developers.
  • GMO Corporations.
  • The Industrial Military Complex.
  • The Pharmaceutical Industry.
  • Private Healthcare.
  • GM Agriculture/Farming.
  • Depopulation Programmes.
  • Agenda 21.

And Finally….

Given the highly contentious nature of Chemtrails, the AGW issue, the concerns about the IPCC and all the evidence that has been presented here, the true intention of any aerial spraying activity (along with all its consequences) should be carefully considered.

This article has presented an abundance of evidence proving that Aerial Aerosol Spraying activities are already underway in the UK.

The article has also concluded what action should be taken now.

Simply put – All Aerial Spraying Must Be Banned.

RiP thanks you for taking the time to read this article.

We leave you now with Sophie Ellis Bextor and her tune Groovejet.

Author: Anonymous.

Special Thanks to – The Chemtrails Project UK.